PUBPOL-646S
STRATEGIC STORYTELLING
Not in Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that the readings, films, or examples carry real weight. Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredSpring
Typical enrollment15–16
Semesters of data2
4.6
Hrs / week
25
Responses
31
Enrollment
81%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.7
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.9
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.8
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.3
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysismedium
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 90 comments across 2 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that the readings, films, or examples carry real weight. Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Readings, films, or outside materials come up repeatedly as a real strength rather than filler.
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
• Students repeatedly say the course teaches something concrete, whether that is content mastery, research skill, or a strong foundation.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
Watch out for
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
The difference between empathy and sympathy, the power of stories from both an advocacy and humanities perspective, how to frame concepts in the context of development to name a few.
Spring 2025 · Admay, Catherine
I learned the specific aspects of a "good" story, how to use story to promote sustainable development, and how to deconstruct a story for meaning and purpose.
Spring 2025 · Admay, Catherine
Admay truly went above and beyond. From the very first day, I was impressed by how much she already knew about each of us, and throughout the course, she continuously integrated our ideas into the class. That made the learning experience feel incredibly personal and intentional. Overall, we learned the deep importance and transformative power of storytelling as a tool to help build a world where every living being can flourish. Storytelling is one of the most powerful tools for change because it’s deeply embedded in how humans have shared knowledge for millennia—and because it speaks directly to the emotional part of the brain that shapes decision-making. Through this course, I learned: 1. How to use artistic storytelling techniques and frameworks to craft narratives for social impact. 2. The science behind why stories move people and how they can shape attitudes, behaviors, and policies. 3. How to identify and counteract harmful or dominant narratives by telling stories that align with our values and vision for a better world.
Spring 2025 · Admay, Catherine
This was the only class I've taken in Duke that challenged my way of thinking, I would have multiple "aha" moments in the course related to fundamental aspects of society, change, power, etc. that are missing in every other course. Insights- understanding parallel ways of communication, their intention, impact, power, strengths, weaknesses, and how to structure them. I feel incredible empowered to use this information to frame policy, and feel like I am walking away with value that all students should be getting because I took this course. Methods/skills- this is the only class where we consistently analyze and really go deep into the underlying ideas, values, impacts, and structure of development. Even though it was an international development course, the application is across all sectors because most policy we're interested in (schools, transpiration, etc.) is touched by development and is at its core, a subsection of development. I found the class to be highly relevant to every aspect of policymaking, and the process of metacognition, reflection, and analysis is unmatched. The skills and methods in ways of thinking I learned and practiced in this class are the most valuable aspect of my MPP so far. Knowledge- I learned so much about how a topic I was interested in- communicating policy- has a wide field around it that has very intentional goals and being able to really get exposure to the macro-level landscape that then shapes our ideas as policy makers that we're exposed to in the world, and then understanding how to TRULY analyze those options and expand, was a highlight. In prep for our final paper, we reviewed key parts of our work and key readings to reflect on and were asked which reading we would remove from the syllabus- I did not have a single one I would remove because I was so grateful for all that I learned. Meanwhile, in other courses you can get an A without ever doing the reading b/c the readings don't add anything and the professors just ask for you to spit back what they told you. Admay actually teaches you how to think, teaches you how to analyze, reflect, meaningfully synthesize, etc. and those skills are the kind that make leaders, create change, and actually influence policy.
Spring 2025 · Admay, Catherine
1. How to look critically at development, its definitions, and its leading thinkers 2. What makes a good story and how to use stories strategically to convince stakeholders 3. How to value the gift of a story from someone else and how to treat someone's story as a gif
Spring 2025 · Admay, Catherine
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2025 | Admay, Catherine 4.3Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.3Difficulty4.2Would retake100%Based on 14 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 16 |
| Spring 2024 | Admay, Catherine 4.3Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.3Difficulty4.2Would retake100%Based on 14 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.5 | 3.0 | 5.2 | 15 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-761 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICTPUBPOL-789 MINI-SEMINARS IN IDP4.1PUBPOL-816 ETHICS AND POLICY-MAKING