PUBPOL-789
MINI-SEMINARS IN IDP
Offered Fall 2026
Term
Instructor
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that the readings, films, or examples carry real weight. Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredSpring, Fall
Typical enrollment7–19
Semesters of data4
3.7
Hrs / week
89
Responses
124
Enrollment
72%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.5
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.4
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.5
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
2.9
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysishigh
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 183 comments across 8 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that the readings, films, or examples carry real weight. Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Readings, films, or outside materials come up repeatedly as a real strength rather than filler.
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who will engage with the materials instead of skimming everything.
Student Responses
I got a chance to get exposure to what is happening at a global level with food systems-especially concerning emissions, blue foods, research, and development
Spring 2025 · Chow, Jennifer
As someone with very little knowledge of food systems coming into this course, I first and foremost walking away from the course with a broad understanding of how food systems work and how they will need to change in a climate-change-intensifying world. I also am incredibly appreciative of Professor Chow's teaching us that there are tradeoffs to pretty much any "solution" to the food crisis and that there will always be winners and losers. I feel that this kind of thought process/mindset is translatable to pretty much any set of solutions to a global crisis, so I'm thankful to have developed the ability to think critically about solutions and understand that a "silver bullet" almost never exists. I also feel that I've learned how I can modify my food consumption habits to better align with a sustainable mindset. I might never eat red meat again!
Spring 2025 · Chow, Jennifer
I learned a lot about food systems, its relation to climate change, and true cost accounting. I also learned about some of the big food system/climate/development challenges we face in the near future and the different ways in which we can approach these problems. Very informative!
Spring 2025 · Chow, Jennifer
So much! Being able to think outside of the US and it's policies was really cathatrtic. The timing of being in this course seemed very timely - and relevant. So many great concepts covered and so much amazing analysis my brain is still parsing through!
Spring 2025 · Chow, Jennifer
I learned that food systems is a VERY deep field and that a lot of research remains to be defined and explored. I was fascinated by two topics: True Cost Accounting and use of emerging technologies to monitor food safety. I wanted to keep learning more and more about these topics.
Spring 2025 · Chow, Jennifer
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2025 | Chow, Jennifer | 4.4 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 55 |
| Fall 2024 | Sager, Manuel | 4.8 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 14 |
| Spring 2024 | Sisson, Andrew | — | — | 3.6 | 37 |
| Fall 2023 | Sager, Manuel | 4.2 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 18 |