PUBPOL-517
NAT SEC SIM
Offered Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students generally rate the course well. Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall
Typical enrollment26–26
Semesters of data1
4.5
Hrs / week
13
Responses
26
Enrollment
50%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.9
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.8
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.9
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.2
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysislow
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 48 comments across 1 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students generally rate the course well. Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Regular lecture load
Lectures matter here, but the evidence points to a fairly standard lecture burden rather than a course dominated by long or exceptionally dense lectures.
Strengths
• Instructor ratings are strong even when the comments do not cluster around one obvious positive theme.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms.
Watch out for
• Most of the signal comes from a limited sample, so be careful about over-generalizing.
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
This course was excellent. It taught students strategy, introduced them to the instruments of national power, and challenged their problem-solving abilities.
Fall 2025 · Schanzer, David
In general, I learned a lot about potential future policy concerns. I learned a lot about the Arctic Passages & what rationales various states could use to claim access to those trade routes. I also learned about DEWs and hypersonics and a bit about crypto-- although I still don't fully understand it. I learned a lot about gameplay-- waiting to make controversial moves so others have less time to respond to them. I realized the importance of early strategic thinking and the importance of looking at the world holistically-- where can an actor gain control in small ways that can be used to influence other things later. I also learned about organizing a large group of people with differing opinions and ideas to ensure you're actually able to get things done.
Fall 2025 · Schanzer, David
National Security from different angles, communication, negotiation, chance to practice some theory
Fall 2025 · Schanzer, David
- Negotiating and talking to a different party - Thinking multiple moves/steps in advance - An overview of the Arctic
Fall 2025 · Schanzer, David
1) Contemporary knowledge of contemporary/future international relations issues: the Arctic, advanced weapons, quantum computing, climate change, cryptocurrency, misinformation 2) Practice negotiating 3) Power dynamics in international relations.
Fall 2025 · Schanzer, David
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Schanzer, David 4.9Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.9Difficulty3.9Would retake100%Based on 11 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.9 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 26 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-221 9/11 & ITS AFTERMATH4.8PUBPOL-290-2 SELECTED PUBLIC POLICY TOPICSPUBPOL-292 NAT SEC SIM5.0PUBPOL-590-1 ADV TOP IN PUBLIC POLICY4.5PUBPOL-803 POLICY ANALYSIS I4.8