PUBPOL-808
MASTERS PROJECT II
Not in Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mixed. The clearest upside is that some students still find real value in the course. Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredSpring
Typical enrollment85–85
Semesters of data1
6.0
Hrs / week
20
Responses
85
Enrollment
24%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
3.8
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.2
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.2
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.6
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysislow
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 47 comments across 1 sections
Feedback is mixed. The clearest upside is that some students still find real value in the course. Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Regular lecture load
Lectures matter here, but the evidence points to a fairly standard lecture burden rather than a course dominated by long or exceptionally dense lectures.
Strengths
• Instructor ratings are strong even when the comments do not cluster around one obvious positive theme.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who are genuinely interested in the topic and willing to engage with the course on its own terms.
Watch out for
• Most of the signal comes from a limited sample, so be careful about over-generalizing.
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
1: understanding of the project subject matter; 2: engagements with the client, and 3: obtain perspectives from different sectors
Spring 2024 · Rogerson, Kenneth
-Research -Analysis -Writing
Spring 2024 · Rogerson, Kenneth
I learnt how to work closely with a client, to conduct primary research and to be concise yet effective in my commuication.
Spring 2024 · Rogerson, Kenneth
1. Through 808, have known about the specific knowledge in the project area 2. Communication skill when doing a project 3. Before starting doing the project, understand client requirements as soon as possible, even I am not actually familiar with the area
Spring 2024 · Rogerson, Kenneth
How to apply research methodology How to store and manage qualitative data How to structure a self-guided research project to effectively reach goals and deadlines
Spring 2024 · Rogerson, Kenneth
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2024 | Rogerson, Kenneth 4.9Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.9Difficulty2.8Would retake88%Based on 21 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 3.8 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 85 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-101CNS INFO, TECH, ETHICS AND POLIC4.5PUBPOL-857 QUALITATIVE METHODS3.8