PUBPOL-743
PUB PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Not in Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students say they actually learn something useful. Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredSpring
Typical enrollment19–24
Semesters of data2
4.9
Hrs / week
15
Responses
43
Enrollment
35%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.4
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.3
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.6
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.2
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysismedium
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 40 comments across 2 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students say they actually learn something useful. Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Students repeatedly say the course teaches something concrete, whether that is content mastery, research skill, or a strong foundation.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
Watch out for
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
This course was one of my favourite courses I had this semester, and Professor Fernando made that exceptional. I have grasped the most important skills I will need in either designing, reviewing, supervising, or negotiating any PPP project that comes my way in a more professional, skilful, and confident way. The professor has made the learning process hands on we all got the basics of PPP more practically including actual simulation of important events in any PPP project like bidding, negotiation, defending the PPP project of your choosing, introduction to new and enhanced software's like the Crystal ball....it was quite a BALL for me! I am really glad that I get to pick the professor's brain within the limited time I had with him-he is incredible and gifted.
Spring 2025 · Fernholz, Fernando
- Various analytical skills that are applicable in practice. - Insights into the functioning of public-private partnership projects.
Spring 2025 · Fernholz, Fernando
Management of risks and incentives under different contractual arrangements Risk analysis using Crystal Ball Design of PPP with key parameters using Excel Scenario analysis using Excel functions
Spring 2025 · Fernholz, Fernando
Integrating Financial and Economic Analysis in PPP Projects (distinguish between financial viability for private investors (through NPV and IRR calculations) and broader economic viability for society and the government), Crystal Ball, Sensitivity Analysis test how changes in key parameters affect project outcomes, and so much more!!
Spring 2025 · Fernholz, Fernando
Benefits of mixing state capacity with private sector expertise Mechanics behind PPPs How to appraise a PPP
Spring 2025 · Fernholz, Fernando
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 2025 | Fernholz, Fernando 3.5Rate My ProfessorsQuality3.5Difficulty3.0Would retake50%Based on 3 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.5 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 19 |
| Spring 2024 | Fernholz, Fernando 3.5Rate My ProfessorsQuality3.5Difficulty3.0Would retake50%Based on 3 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.3 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 24 |