PUBPOL-704
MASTER'S PROJECT PREPARATION
Offered Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students say they actually learn something useful. Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall
Typical enrollment18–24
Semesters of data3
4.3
Hrs / week
41
Responses
65
Enrollment
63%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.1
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.1
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.4
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
2.5
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysishigh
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 88 comments across 3 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that students say they actually learn something useful. Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Regular lecture load
Lectures matter here, but the evidence points to a fairly standard lecture burden rather than a course dominated by long or exceptionally dense lectures.
Strengths
• Students repeatedly say the course teaches something concrete, whether that is content mastery, research skill, or a strong foundation.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who want substance, not a disposable elective.
Watch out for
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
Time Management and Project Planning; Research Design and Methodology ; Critical Literature Review Skills.
Fall 2024 · Mirovitskaya, Natalia
She already taught these things to us last year but we forgot them, so now remembering. Policy analysis tools we learned.
Fall 2024 · Mirovitskaya, Natalia
I reviewed how to identify a policy problem. How to prepare a prospectus. How to write a policy paper.
Fall 2024 · Mirovitskaya, Natalia
How to do stakeholder analysis. What is PESTLE Analysis. How to work with E-Library.
Fall 2024 · Mirovitskaya, Natalia
First, I strengthened the analysis process I learned during the first semester. Second, I learned about Duke's Library's tools and resources. Finally, I had more clarity on what I will need for next semester.
Fall 2024 · Mirovitskaya, Natalia
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Mirovitskaya, Natalia 4.0Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.0Difficulty3.0Would retake0%Based on 1 ratingClick to view on RMP → | 4.3 | 2.4 | — | 18 |
| Fall 2024 | Mirovitskaya, Natalia 4.0Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.0Difficulty3.0Would retake0%Based on 1 ratingClick to view on RMP → | 3.9 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 23 |
| Fall 2023 | Mirovitskaya, Natalia 4.0Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.0Difficulty3.0Would retake0%Based on 1 ratingClick to view on RMP → | — | — | 4.1 | 24 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-700S POLICY ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENT4.3PUBPOL-754 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY SYSTEM4.6