PUBPOL-505S
NATL SECURITY DECISION MAKING
Offered Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall
Typical enrollment16–18
Semesters of data2
4.7
Hrs / week
26
Responses
34
Enrollment
76%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.5
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.5
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.6
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.3
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysismedium
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 86 comments across 2 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
• Readings, films, or outside materials come up repeatedly as a real strength rather than filler.
• Students repeatedly say the course teaches something concrete, whether that is content mastery, research skill, or a strong foundation.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Watch out for
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
Professional writing, opinion writing, presentation and argumentation.
Fall 2024 · Nichols, Timothy
- Borrowing from Joseph Nye's concept of contextual intelligence, I gained a deeper understanding of how decision-makers must adapt strategies to evolving environments. This was particularly relevant when analyzing how historical decisions—such as the Cuban Missile Crisis—hinged on leaders' abilities to interpret the geopolitical landscape, assess adversaries’ motives, and anticipate consequences. - The course provided a nuanced view of how hard (military force) and soft (diplomatic and cultural influence) power must be integrated to achieve national security objectives. The concept of smart power, combining these elements effectively, was especially useful in understanding modern great-power competition with China and Russia. - Through case studies like the Osama bin Laden raid and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, I saw how the lack—or presence—of interagency coordination impacts decision-making outcomes. I learned about frameworks like the National Security Council's (NSC) role in integrating interagency efforts and the challenges in managing bureaucratic silos.
Fall 2024 · Nichols, Timothy
National security decision making was an interesting course that challenged me to think on a different level of support to the national level. Advisement to the President is significant and cannot be rushed or completed without knowledge of the multiple layers of consideration of previous actions or policies.
Fall 2024 · Nichols, Timothy
1. structure of the NSC 2. a president's relationship with his natl sec advisor and NSC 3. how the US is perceived globally and how its actions impact different regions/nations
Fall 2024 · Nichols, Timothy
Familiar with several of the course topics, my familiarity was informed by experience. Course provided an excellent opportunity to dive deeply into foundational and sourcing documents and gain better understanding of “how it should be.” Course encouraged a practice I intend to continue: get engaged in the hard problems. Discussing policy is one thing; engaging policy to the point where you are willing to put pen to paper and enter the ongoing debate is another. We wrote several policy papers and OpEds that proved excellent forcing functions!
Fall 2024 · Nichols, Timothy
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Nichols, Timothy | 4.8 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 18 |
| Fall 2024 | Nichols, Timothy | 4.2 | 3.1 | 4.8 | 16 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-507S INTEL FOR NATIONAL SECURITY4.8PUBPOL-881 PROFESSIONAL PRAC IN NAT SEC4.7