PUBPOL-311S
BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Not in Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall
Typical enrollment15–15
Semesters of data1
4.4
Hrs / week
14
Responses
15
Enrollment
93%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.3
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.5
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.8
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.4
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysislow
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 49 comments across 1 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent. The sample is still thin, so treat this as directional rather than definitive.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
• Readings, films, or outside materials come up repeatedly as a real strength rather than filler.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Watch out for
• Most of the signal comes from a limited sample, so be careful about over-generalizing.
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
evaluation of corporate influence on society, specific stakeholders (employees, areas they occupy, etc.), and the individual. saw these applications in case studies: textile factories, NC with smithfield farming, duke, prisons, etc. also learned how these systems were created in the first place, and the different schools of thought on how to address corporatization (friedman, and then interpretations of CSR, how the EU has addressed it through the Global Compact, etc.)
Fall 2023 · Katzenstein, Suzanne
I learned about integrating evidence, understanding, and so many other skills.
Fall 2023 · Katzenstein, Suzanne
Interviewing, creative writing, legal research
Fall 2023 · Katzenstein, Suzanne
Great learning about working w a partner, exploring BHR
Fall 2023 · Katzenstein, Suzanne
Better time management and experience with engaging community partners
Fall 2023 · Katzenstein, Suzanne
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2023 | Katzenstein, Suzanne 4.4Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.4Difficulty2.8Would retake86%Based on 49 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.3 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 15 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-155D INTRO TO POLICY ANALYSIS4.1PUBPOL-564 DEMOCRACY LAB4.4PUBPOL-807 MASTER'S PROJECT I2.9