PUBPOL-302D
POL CHOICE/VAL CONFLICT
Offered Fall 2026
Term
Instructor
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall, Spring
Typical enrollment14–58
Semesters of data5
4.1
Hrs / week
225
Responses
528
Enrollment
43%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.3
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.5
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.4
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.3
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysishigh
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 518 comments across 16 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A difficulty is mixed
The reports split here. Some comments frame grading as fair and reachable, while others describe stricter standards or more work than expected to land top grades.
Homework Load
Moderate homework load
Homework load looks moderate. The recurring signal is steady weekly work, but not a course that turns every assignment into a grind.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
• Readings, films, or outside materials come up repeatedly as a real strength rather than filler.
Tradeoffs
• There is no single dominant complaint theme, but the feedback is not uniformly glowing either.
Best fit for
Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Student Responses
I learned about different ethical considerations that go into policy making; I learned about news kinds of policy; I learned how to have conversations with my peers about these topics.
Spring 2024 · Antepli, Abdullah
1. Philosophical underpinnings of ethical thought 2. Ethical theories of deontology, utilitarianism, and consequentialism 3. How policy intersects with ethics
Spring 2024 · Antepli, Abdullah
I learned how to think critically about ethics, how to debate a policy or moral topic, and began thinking more introspectively.
Spring 2024 · Antepli, Abdullah
I learned about the different ethical frameworks used across history, within athens (plato, aristotle, etc.) and Jerusalem (Islam, Christianity, Judaism, etc.)
Spring 2024 · Antepli, Abdullah
- how to understand things through an ethical and moral framework - knowledge on ancient ethics, religious ethics, and contemporary ethics - ethical cost-benefit analysis on policy topics
Spring 2024 · Antepli, Abdullah
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Slank, Shanna | 4.3 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 103 |
| Spring 2025 | Antepli, Abdullah 3.4Rate My ProfessorsQuality3.4Difficulty3.3Would retake50%Based on 14 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.4 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 216 |
| Fall 2024 | Taylor, Donald 2.8Rate My ProfessorsQuality2.8Difficulty3.2Would retake50%Based on 46 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.3 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 71 |
| Spring 2024 | Siegel, Jennifer 4.9Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.9Difficulty2.7Would retake100%Based on 7 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 3.9 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 115 |
| Fall 2023 | Hoffman, David 4.7Rate My ProfessorsQuality4.7Difficulty3.0Would retake92%Based on 71 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.6 | 2.8 | — | 23 |