PUBPOL-259S
WOMEN AS LEADERS
Not in Fall 2026
Term
Overview
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Difficulty runs on the high side even without a single dominant complaint theme. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
DepartmentPPS
Terms offeredFall
Typical enrollment5–16
Semesters of data2
4.5
Hrs / week
11
Responses
21
Enrollment
52%
Response Rate
Evaluation Scores
Overall quality
Teaching, content, and experience combined.
4.5
Intellectually stimulating
Challenges students to think deeply.
4.7
Instructor effectiveness
Explains concepts and facilitates learning.
4.7
Difficulty
Higher means harder.
3.9
Feedback Analysis
Feedback Analysismedium
Analysis based on student evaluations
Based on 38 comments across 2 sections
Feedback is mostly positive. The strongest signal is that discussion is a clear strength. Difficulty runs on the high side even without a single dominant complaint theme. Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Student Reports
How hard is the A?
A is doable but not automatic
The signal here is more do-the-work-and-you-should-be-fine than easy-A chatter. Students do not describe the A as automatic, but the evidence also does not paint grading as punishing.
Homework Load
Heavy homework load
Homework load is one of the clearest friction points. Students repeatedly describe assignments, readings, or problem sets as time-consuming.
Lecture Load
Lighter lecture burden
Student comments describe this as more discussion-, seminar-, or workshop-driven than lecture-dependent. The lecture burden itself does not sound like the main source of friction.
Strengths
• Discussion is a clear strength; students repeatedly describe the class conversation as engaging and useful.
Tradeoffs
• Difficulty runs high even when comments do not settle on one dominant complaint.
Best fit for
Best for students who will actually talk in class instead of sitting silent.
Watch out for
• A large share of the evidence comes from one instructor's version of the course, so this may not generalize cleanly.
Student Responses
- learned about the world's systems through analytical framing of the 5 p's: positionality, power, people, practices, policies. feel equipped with the language and awareness to both see and navigate the systemic boundaries women face in their pursuit of enacting their leadership, as well as the many ways leadership can be defined/be seen in practice/be practiced - refined critical thinking skills, both in response to scholarly articles, real-world events, but perhaps most poignantly, by looking inward and doing an expansive amount of self-reflection - practiced a variety of writing styles, such as personal narratives, ted-talk style presentations, and op-eds
Fall 2025 · Zagbayou, Alexandra
Critical thinking, reflecting on readings and using eachothers' ideas to better mine.
Fall 2025 · Zagbayou, Alexandra
We learned a lot of vocabulary, theories, and frameworks surrounding leadership and its connection to women's studies. We learned about the second shift theory, aspects of positionality, and how to be a likeable badass.
Fall 2025 · Zagbayou, Alexandra
1. How to have hard conversations and be vulnerable about things I may not be super comfortable talking about. 2. How to think about the 5 Ps: positionality, power, practices, people, policies and how they affect expereinces 3. How to take your experience and the systems you live in to understand leadership and your individual ability to lead.
Fall 2025 · Zagbayou, Alexandra
In this course, I learned about several different frameworks that can be used to analyze women’s leadership. For example, I learned to analyze how women’s reproductive rights and movements have shaped the course of female education and professional development. Additionally, I learned about the Second Shift and unpaid care work gaps as a framework. In addition, I learned about how gender influences female leadership and ideas such as the double bind.
Fall 2025 · Zagbayou, Alexandra
Rating History
Rating history
Error bars show \u00B11 std dev
| Term | Instructor | Overall | Difficulty | Hrs/wk | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2025 | Zagbayou, Alexandra 3.3Rate My ProfessorsQuality3.3Difficulty3.8Would retake45%Based on 11 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.4 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 5 |
| Fall 2023 | Zagbayou, Alexandra 3.3Rate My ProfessorsQuality3.3Difficulty3.8Would retake45%Based on 11 ratingsClick to view on RMP → | 4.5 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 16 |
Instructor
Also teaches
PUBPOL-263S LEADING IN AND WITH COMMUNITY4.3PUBPOL-590 ADV TOP IN PUBLIC POLICY4.3